Law360, San Francisco (April 14, 2021, 11:11 PM EDT) — Apple on Wednesday urged a California federal judge to rethink his tentative decision against decertifying a class of consumers accusing the company of replacing broken iPhones and iPads with refurbished parts under a misleading warranty, saying a new Ninth Circuit decision and expert evidence support decertification.
Apple’s attorney, William A. Isaacson of Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison LLP, told U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick that the case law on which the judge based his decision to certify the class is now “outdated.”
“There’s been a change in both the law on this issue and the facts on this issue…
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!